|
Lotusphere 2012: my thoughts
Julian Buss, January 19th, 2012 14:33:55
Tags: lotusphere
The last day of Lotusphere 2012 is here: a good time to write down some thoughts.
From the sight of a vendor You know, YouAtNotes had a pedestal in the showcase. There were less pedestals than last year, but that was no disadvantage - on the contrary! There were more people coming to the showcase and less vendors, which is a good combination (at least for us, the vendors). We had a very good flow of visitors, and most of them were interested in Domino To Go, our solution for creating native mobile Apps for Lotus Notes applications. Boy, we really got very, very good feedback and everyone told us that our Domino To Go is the way to go. So, showing Domino To Go on Lotusphere for the first time was a huge success. Now we will have a lot of work after the Lotusphere: releasing the public beta, creating more marketing materials, contacting all the leads from Lotusphere... but we're absolutely looking forward to that :-) Furthermore, we had good and interesting talks with various IBM executives. And that is one very important thing for us on Lotusphere: meeting people and building connections. Because in the end, the personal contact is invaluable and cannot be replaced by the internet. About Lotus Notes and Domino "Social Business" was the motto this year, and for IBM, this translates to "Connections", leaving very few space for Lotus Notes and Domino. I am fully aware that the classic Notes business decreases, since a lot of people want to do browser based stuff, cloud and so on. And I do not have a problem with that. IBM invested a lot of resources into XPages and making Domino and Designer a "kick ass" development platform again. While it can be discussed if they reached the "kick ass" goal, personally I'm very happy with XPages, Domino Designer and the Extension Library. All of that feels modern to me and enables me to create very, very good solutions very, very fast. Even more I (and many other business partners and developers) are concerned about the NSF database format. Everyone knows that NSF is great, but it's old and has it's problems (32K anyone? Full text indexing latency? Scalability with many documents?). And just as I expected, IBM simply does nothing about it. Nothing. Not. a. single.word. about. improving. NSF. Or did I miss something? That's a dissapointment. NSF is falling behind other No-SQL solutions, and while XPages might attract new developers, the will be scared away again when they learn about the ancient problems of NSF. What a pity. So, what did IBM announce in the IBM Lotus Notes and Domino space? No Notes 9, but a Notes and Domino "Social Edition". IBM claims that jumping to version 9 would scare customers because such a version jump seems to need huge "migration projects". That is true, so using a different name is a smart move. But to be honest, I didn't saw anything that would justify a big version jump anyway. There are some nice improvements like embedding "social containers" in mail (that means, you can receive mails where you can actually do things without leaving the mail context, for example approving a workflow). But nothing big such as a client with a smaller footprint or an XPages RichText editor matching up to the Notes RichText editor. Lotus Domino gets some improvements, too, for example stuff like OpenAuth support needed to work with other social software. As far as I see, these improvements are made by using "plugins" (like the Extension Library), the core of Domino remains mostly untouched. So, mostly Notes and Domino stay where they are while being improved here and there. Notes Plugin for the Browser One really nice announcement is the upcoming general availability of a plugin for the browser, which executes Lotus Notes applications. That's great for organizations wanting to standardize on the browser and get rid of the Notes client. From what I've heard, the plugin weights well below 100MB and runs the Notes application in something like a basic Notes client. The plugin will be first available for Firefox and IBM is considering which second browser to support. Connections, social this, social that If I would get a dollar for every time I read or heared "social" during this Lotusphere, I could retire and relocate to a sunny island of my own. On the marketing side, all this social wording is ok for me, because if a customers buys this social thing they have to come to IBM. Microsoft has nothing in this area. On the personal side, I don't see any difference in working "social" than in our past and present way of working. What's "social" about? As far as I understand, it's about working together, in a community. While members of the community might be collegues from my own company or customers. Guess what? We are working this way for years. I cannot see what's really "new" with this "social business" approach. OK, I can build some kind of internal facebook. I can store files so that everyone can actually access them. That's nice and can be helpful, but for us and our customers it's only nice to have, not must have. And again, even if this sounds old-school, E-Mail is the primary communication channel for us and our customers. And I fail to see why I should replace my E-Mail inbox with an activity stream that spams me with a zillion of notifications. I hate this in facebook, and I would hate this in any other internal, facebook style tool, too. In my E-Mail inbox, I can mark mails as read and unread, I can move them out of the inbox when I'm done with them. Can I do such thing in the activity stream? If not, how do I seperate items where I have to work on from items I'm done with? Don't get me wrong, Connections is a great tool if you have the problems that are solved by Connections. And IBM is creating a market where Microsoft has nothing to compete, that is very good. But it's clearly an enterprise tool and therefore not that important for most of the medium and small businesses out there. I think for those companies, XPages, Domino and Notes are still more important (in that order). Resumee For us, it has been a great Lotusphere. There is a lot of business opportunity out there for our new Domino To Go product. For Connections, it has a been a great event, too. For Domino, XPages and Notes there were highs and lows. Beside that, there were some other important new products, too. Like IBM Docs (think Google Docs, but better and from IBM). It has a great name, and is a great tool. On the personal side, I enjoyed this special community once more very, very much. You, the people I talked with, the people I do business with, the people that read my articles, you make the difference. Thank you.
Comments (5) | Permanent Link
1) Lotusphere 2012: my thoughts
Thanks for your thoughts Julian, one day I will get to Lotusphere just to see what goes on. :-) You picked up on one of my pet peeves as well: the "Social" thing isn't that new really - we've been doing it for years too by the use of Teamrooms, Quickplace etc. On the positive side I am really interested in this Browser plug-in as well. One of my problems when accessing the Teamrooms has been how poorly it works in a Browser - this looks like a great development. Like you I understand it will be Firefox and one other Browser - I would imagine IE as it is still really popular in a lot of my Clients' offices. I would love to see it for the iPad Browser though. 2) Lotusphere 2012: my thoughts
Great Post.. honest and to the point.. Missed the LS12, but it's great to read whats going on and where it's going.. 3) Lotusphere 2012: my thoughts
Julian - I run an association with 30 staff members. My IT manager is a strong advocate for Lotus Notes, which we use. However, I have staff members who want us to change and their main arguments are 1) we are too limited in finding software (CRM, Project Management etc.) that integrates with Lotus. There are many more choices that integrate with Microsoft. 2) If the IT manager leaves/gets hit by a truck, we are limited in finding a replacement because so few people are Lotus experts. Your opinion on these arguments? 4) Lotusphere 2012: my thoughts
Apologies for the length of the reply - I didn't have time to make it shorter. :-) Personally I run our IT like a benign dictatorship. I welcome others opinions but that doesn't mean I will listen to them! :-) 1. It's also old-fashioned (maybe because I am) but I don't tell my Designers what software to use because I do not have the expertise to decide what's best. If the staff members are expert enough to have an opinion then fair enough but most staff members aren't, they want something that they can use. There may well be more Project Management / CRM / HR software packages that integrate better with Microsoft (do you mean Outlook here?) but the thing to bear in mind is that it will almost certainly lead to more expense in terms of extra MS Licensing and Servers. There are a number of packages that do the job available for Lotus Notes from OpenNTF for very little cost / free. The thing is what software does an Association need, what exactly are you trying to achieve? Have a think about what it is you actually need the Software to do. A lot of the time the extra software packages are a bit like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. They have a lot of fancy add-ons that look great but in fact are probably hardly ever used. However at the end of the day it will come down to cost. You don't say if you are using Notes as E-mail or as an Email / Application Server. If you have any applications then not only will you need to buy the new software and the Exchange / Outlook Licenses but you will also have to pay to either port your applications to something else (Sharepoint?) or you will need to build them again in something else. Either way that is not cheap. 2. We are a small company and have less than 10 users and I am the only one here who knows anything about Lotus Notes / Domino and that is not saying much as I have a "real" job as well. In the 15 or so years we've had Lotus Notes I have for the most part averaged a couple of days per year needing professional support (none at all in the last four years) and most of the issues were caused by the Server OS rather than Notes / Domino. However I do have access to a number of companies who can offer support if required and that is really all you need. If I got run over tomorrow (and I'm hoping not to because I am going to the Scotland / England Rugby match) then I know that the Company could phone up someone to sort out any issues they have. When all is said and done you have an IT Manager who is a strong Advocate for Lotus Notes then as the IT Manager and seeing as how that is his job and as he must by definition be a bit of an expert (it's only us who employ an Engineer as an IT Manager) and as the Association is paying for that expertise - why would you listen to anyone else? :-) 5) Lotusphere 2012: my thoughts
1) The argument of integration surprises me. I've got a CRM that exports to Excel, writes to Word and is used as an address book. None of which is rocket science to implement. My previous company did the same with their own proprietary Lotus Notes applications. And whether you're using ODBC, JDBC or LEI, it's possible to build business-critical integration with ERPs, provided they allow access. With XPages Extension Library it's possible to integrate with social platforms. And with 8.5.4 Social Edition it will be possible to offer embedded experiences into mail platforms that support them. Beyond this, turn the question around. Do they value the security of their data? Lotus Notes provides strong and flexible security with easy implementation. Do they use offline capabilities? My previous company lost a contract to a Microsoft house that said they could provide a CRM and flexible reporting system offline. Two years later they contacted my company because they needed backup support for the Lotus Notes developers they had employed because the offline system was not reliable. So they still used Lotus Notes. Where do they want to access the data? With Lotus Notes and the same skill-set you can deliver to rich client, web, and mobile browser. What budget do they have? John Head presented a good session at Lotusphere which compared converting a Notes Client app to XPages vs Sharepoint. Guess which won. 2) There are plenty of Lotus experts around. I've spoken at BLUG for the last two years and Theo has no problem finding world-class speakers and attendees. Same for EntwicklerCamp and other LUGs around Europe. IBM had no problem selecting 50 champions for the Collaboration Solutions space, a large number of whom work with Lotus Notes. OpenNTF provides a wealth of resources and the download figures are impressive - there are plenty of Lotus experts using the resources. A number of community members started using StackOverflow for XPages questions recently to raise awareness outside the yellow bubble. It is already getting a lot of usage. The question to pose is what research they have done and evidence collected that it is hard to find Lotus experts. In my experience of recent recruitment my company went through, it's not. |
